Showing posts with label Marieke. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marieke. Show all posts

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Marieke's review - Possession by A.S. Byatt

Possession: A Romance by A.S. Byatt

This book takes the term 'literary fiction' to a whole new level. Its main characters are present-day literary scholars whose subjects of study are Victorian-era literary poets, all caught in a complicated web of inter-connections. It's all very bookish.

Possession -- the title reverberates through the story, as our heroes Maud and Roland get caught up in, possessed by, a literary mystery that promises to rewrite all previous scholarship in their field. Exciting, eh!

Their field is the critical analysis of the work of poets Randolph Henry Ash and Christabel LaMotte. Haven't heard of them? That's because they're fictional -- Byatt has invented them, along with great tracts of their poetry, letters, and diaries.

Roland and Maud hunt down clues, re-interpret texts, and follow in the footsteps of their long-dead subjects. As they fall deeper into the spell cast by this mystery -- a secret romance -- they find their own lives changing in unexpected ways.

This transformation -- metamorphosis, a theme running through the entire book -- gives weight to the scholarly claim that the lives and work of poets from centuries past still have power or impact on our lives today. The more Roland and Maud discover about Ash and LaMotte, the more they uncover their own, hidden selves.

Sounds terribly gripping, I know. But what I mean is -- Byatt does a magnificent job of breathing life into her Victorian poets and infusing their work with love and passion. And showing us how our heroes' search affects them deeply.

Both Roland and Maud, before their adventure began, had been only half-living, immersed in their work, cold and alone in Maud's case and thwarted and entombed in Roland's case.

The scholarly life is portrayed here with a heavy dose of irony. Byatt lets us laugh at the academics' futile enterprises -- the gloomy underground cavern that houses the 'Ash factory', the unscrupulous American bounty-hunter/scholar with the fat chequebook, the sex-obsessed feminist scholars that interpret everything as a metaphor for the body.

Take this description of the inner sanctum of the Ash corridor in the basement of the British Museum:

Blackadder sat amongst the apparent chaos and actual order of his great edition, sifting a drift of small paper slips in a valley between cliffs of furred-edged index cards and bulging mottled files. Behind him flitted his clerical assistant, pale Paola, her long colourless hair bound in a rubber band, her huge glasses moth-like, her finger tips dusty grey pads. In an inner room, beyond the typewriter cubicle, was a small cavern constructed of filing cabinets, inhabited by Dr Beatrice Nest, almost bricked in by the boxes containing the diary and correspondence of Ellen Ash. (27)

Coming from this dusty, sterile, lightless environment, Roland and Maud find themselves bewilderingly caught up in a search for something beyond the textual -- a love infused both with dizzying intellect and pulsing life-blood. Something REAL, something eternal.

Of course, the living pulse that the scholars trace in the two poets' lives serves to reinvigorate their poetic work. Suddenly Ash's famous love-poem 'Ask to Embla' is no longer addressed to a metaphorical lover but a living, breathing one.

What I especially like about Byatt's approach is that nothing is tossed out, nothing is meaningless. Even though we are shown a satirical portrait of literary scholarship (picture Dr Beatrice Nest huddled in her basement cavern for twenty-five years, creating nothing but boxes of cross-references), we eventually see that there is something there. They were on the right track all the time, minus a few key clues. None of their work is futile, in the end.

Wouldn't that be nice!

This was a delicious literary mystery of the best kind, one where we follow along on the trail of discovery and are invited to examine the primary documents for clues ourselves. And yet we are given more than Roland and Maud can ever have -- a few glimpses into the past, unrecorded on any document. I was suprised Byatt took us there directly; I had assumed that the letters and poems would be all.

Finally, I have to admit (sheepishly) that at times I found the long poems and letters tough going. Forty pages of letters, or ten pages of a diary, or an eight-page narrative poem. I really had to fight off the temptation to skip through them and get back to 'the story'. But I'm glad I didn't, because they added depth to the experience.

Just be warned. They're long, and the type is small. In the end, though, it's definitely worth it.

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

My original review is posted here.

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Marieke's review - Amsterdam

Amsterdam by Ian McEwan

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I want to do justice to Amsterdam and I know I can't even come close. Luckily, there are lots of folks out there who love Ian McEwan's writing and know how deep he delves into his characters. So you already know how flawless his prose is, how masterful his internal landscapes.

Amsterdam is more of the best of McEwan -- every character is so perfectly fleshed out that their every action, however bizarre, makes sense in the context of their perspective. And because this is McEwan, after all, we will have characters acting bizarrely.

Four men who loved Molly Lane meet each other again at her funeral, most with mutual dislike. The implications of Molly's death and her ongoing hold on these men bring about an extended run of cause-and-effect. Dominoes. Once begun, inevitable.

Though this might sound a bit dour, the book surprised me with its humor. What these men really think of each other -- and of themselves -- is enough to crack me up. The pages kept turning as the situation got more and more absurd.

The end reveals the extent of all their self-deception in typical McEwan brilliance.

More things to love:
  • A tongue-in-cheek inside look at the running of a British tabloid newspaper
  • An old-fashioned duel hilariously reinvented for the modern world
  • The loveliest and most detailed hallucinations I've ever read
I stand by my assertion that McEwan always reminds me of Virginia Woolf, in style and execution if not storyline. Amsterdam is my favorite of his so far.

My original review is posted here.

Sunday, February 7, 2010

Marieke's review - Last Orders by Graham Swift

Last Orders by Graham Swift

Some books need to settle a bit before I can write about them. Graham Swift's Last Orders is one of these -- a quiet story of love and loss, the meaning of family, and the unbreakable ties of friendship.

I love the way the story is structured on a day’s journey made by four old friends to scatter the ashes of their recently deceased pal, Jack. As their journey progresses, we get glimpses into the private memories of each character as they revisit moments from their long acquaintance with Jack and with each other.

Strands of emotion connect each character in an invisible web, with Jack surely at the center.

Animosity, admiration, loneliness and jealousy seep out of every word, every gesture, every exchange.

This is a story with more remaining unspoken than is spoken. That’s what I mean by ‘quiet’. But the depth of feeling conveyed is notable: Vince’s resentment toward his father, Ray’s flame for Amy, Lenny’s anger and distrust, Vic’s deep respect for Jack.

Swift’s short chapters sketch the scenes and characters quickly and efficiently but not haphazardly. The effect is like watching a master artist create a magnificent painting with just a few strokes.

My rating: 4 of 5 stars.

You can read my original review here.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Marieke's review - The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood

The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood

A rich, lustrous evocation of a world. Why Iris is telling us her story is not immediately obvious, but she certainly has plenty to tell. And she has her share of secrets, as we come to realise.

Iris is a peculiar narrator. She seems to be telling us her own story -- her marriage to Richard, her entry into womanhood and motherhood, the high society circles she moves in due to the influence of her wealthy husband and sister-in-law -- but actually all this is just the backdrop for the 'real' focus, which is always her sister, Laura.

Laura glows with a golden light like the aura that she paints onto a photo of herself once, as a prank. She seems to be the wonderfully alive, eerily insightful and unconventional heroine of Iris's narrative, despite the fact that she dies in the first line of the book.

Laura haunts Iris as she haunts the town they grew up in, as her words appear quoted on bathroom stalls and literary prizes are given in her name, fifty years after her death. Iris is haunted also by the promise she made her father:

'If anything happens,' he said finally, 'you must promise to look after Laura.' (124)

There is a shuttling back-and-forth of the narrative as several strands weave together: Iris's current, elderly comings and goings; her vivid reminiscences that take her back to her girlhood and then forward in time; newspaper clippings marking important occurences in the Chase family history (deaths especially); and the haunting passages from The Blind Assassin, a novel by Iris's sister Laura (published posthumously).

One of the magical things about this story is that it seems absolutely present and vivid in each of its moments. Thus when we reach the 'present day' it truly does feel as if a lifetime has passed. Near the end of the book I felt I was reaching back into an ancient past to recall the lives of Iris and Laura as girls.

The Blind Assassin (the book within the book) features an anonymous young man who is telling a science-fiction story aloud to an anonymous young woman as they meet secretly, over years. I loved the oral storytelling quality of these chapters and I always wanted more when they ended. Atwood charges those moments with passion, longing and indulgence; the world of Zycron becomes a romantic interlude, true escapism. I wanted to go there.

I suppose this is a story about how imagination can free us from the confines of our lives. Iris spends her life in confinement, imprisoned by class expectations, by a forced sense of propriety in a society she never wanted to be part of, and not least, by a tyrannical husband and his sister-minion.

I can't do justice to the degrading horror that was Iris's marriage. But what strikes even more powerfully is that Atwood reminds us that these horrors were not uniquely Iris's; they were commonplace, even expected. This was how women's lives were then.

About my bridal night... I didn't know what to expect; my only informant had been Reenie, who had led me to believe that whatever would happen would be unpleasant and most likely painful, and in this I was not deceived. She'd also implied that this disagreeable event or sensation would be nothing out of the ordinary - all women went through it, or all who got married - so I shouldn't make a fuss. Grin and bear it had been her words. (294)

We do find out eventually that Iris's and Richard's relationship is not ordinary in the slightest, though the power dynamics that make her completely dependent on him are the conventional, unremarkable ones. The power structures that enslave women and treat them as property.

I was sand, I was snow - written on, rewritten, smoothed over. (455)

This story reveals, more than anything else, the utter devastation wrought by a woman's enforced passivity and helplessness in a male-dominated world.

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

You can find my original review on my blog here.

Monday, November 9, 2009

Introduction - Marieke

Hello! I'm Marieke and my blog is Athyrium filix-femina (The Lady Fern). I mostly write about books and a bit about living in Scotland, where I have lived for the last couple years (I'm from the western U.S.).

I had already decided I wanted to read Booker prize winners, when I discovered the fantastic world of reading challenges. Thanks to all who have participated so far in making this a fun and informative place to be. And thanks to Laura for hosting!

So far, the Booker winners I have read are, with links to my reviews:

1981 Midnight's Children - Rushdie
1988 Oscar and Lucinda - Carey
1989 The Remains of the Day - Ishiguro
1992 The English Patient - Ondaatje (one of my all-time favorites)
1993 Paddy Clarke Ha Ha Ha - Doyle
1994 How Late It Was, How Late - Kelman
1996 Last Orders - Swift
1997 The God of Small Things - Roy (another of my favorites)
2002 Life of Pi - Martel
2007 The Gathering - Enright

The next Booker winners I'd like to read are 1990's Possession (Byatt) and 2000's The Blind Assassin (Atwood). I'd also like to try some Murdoch and Coetzee, whom I haven't ever read.

I wouldn't mind getting my hands on some of the 2009 shortlist, either. It all depends on what's available at the library!

I'm looking forward to sharing ideas and reviews with you all!