My edition of this novel is the Virago Modern Classics
reprint of 2001, which contains an introduction by Paul Bailey. In there he
refers to a letter he received from Elizabeth Taylor after a “New Statesman” article
he wrote in 1973. She wrote:
I feel , after a time, that my
books have dropped into a pit, and must lie there for ever and ever. And there
they were, brought to the light of day once more, and by someone who had truly read them.
Well I can’t guarantee that I have “truly read” Mrs Palfrey
at the Claremont, but I can let you know that I am grateful that this novel
made a Booker Prize Shortlist so I was fortunate enough to come across it as
part of this reading journey. I am grateful they haven’t fallen into a pit.
As the title suggests our main character is Mrs Palfrey,
widowed and embarking upon a new stage in her life where she arrives at the
Claremont Hotel, to see out her retirement. The Hotel is also the residence of
a number of other elderly residents whose daily highlight is the posting of the
evening menu (even though it never changes), gossip, the weather report on the
radio and the events in the other resident’s lives.
Mrs Palfrey has a disinterested grandson Desmond, who
everyone is dying to meet. A chance encounter with a young writer Ludo, allows
Mrs Palfrey to create the impression, to her fellow residents, that this is her
grandson.
What Philip Hensher did for the monotony of suburbia in his
2008 shorlisted novel “The Northern Clemency”, Elizabeth Taylor did 37 years
earlier for the aged care facilities of England, or the hotels that had
permanent residents, as the aged couldn’t afford full time care. Primarily a
novel about aging, but including characters that suffer writers block (or
procrastination) and subjects such as boredom and jealousy this is written with
such precise and luminous prose that you cannot help to feel for the main characters.
It was hard work being old. It
was like being a baby, in reverse. Every day for an infant means some new
little thing learned; every day for the old means some little thing lost. Names
slip away, dates mean nothing, sequences become muddled, and faces blurred.
Both infancy and age are tiring times.
The ordinary people of Britain, the ones novels are rarely
written about, the ones with the “stiff upper lip”, the ones who give
themselves a “good talking-to”, are the ones whose lives I entered through my
time with this novel, and I am grateful of that time. A whole “middle class” too
rarely seen in the pages of award writers novels.
This was one of my favourites from the 1971 list and in summary
one that I personally believe deserved the main gong, slightly in front of
Lessing’s “Briefing for a Decent into Hell”, Kilroy’s “The Big Chapel”, then
Naipaul’s winner and Derek Robinson’s “Goshawk Squadron”. I am still on the
hunt for the missing “St Urbain’s Horseman” and once I find myself a copy will
post a review here.
Cross posted at my blog.
I love the Virago Modern Classics. Thanks to that imprint, I'd read so many forgotten or marginalized authors. This one is high on my to-read list!
ReplyDeleteI'm so glad you enjoyed this book, which was her 11th (of 12) novels. This was the first Taylor I read, also as a VMC, and it inspired me to seek out more of her work and she quickly became one of my favorite authors.
ReplyDeleteNow for a shameless plug: 2012 marks the centenary of Taylor's birth, which is being commemorated in the blogosphere through monthly readalongs of each of her novels. More information can be found on the Elizabeth Taylor Centenary page on my blog.