Originally posted at Book Rhapsody (September 30, 2011).
***
Image from http://www.barnesandnoble.com/
Intro
I
got this at regular price back in college. I bought it even if I found
the cover unappealing: a stray dog on a barren dirt road. I am not into
judging books by their covers, but nice covers sometimes help. It’s hard
not to be drawn to a book with a sleek cover design.
Oh
yes, this novel is a Booker winner. The author is a Nobel laureate. The
author is among the top authors who have the most number of books in
that 1001 list. With all these, expectations are raised notches higher.
And yes, Disgrace is agreed to be his best work. How did his best work fit into my reading taste?
The Rhapsody
Disgrace
lives up to its title: it is a disgrace to the author’s supposed
reputation. That’s straight enough, I think, but really, I am in no mood
to talk about this book because I remember nothing good about it.
Some
things first. This is the only novel of Coetzee that I have read. I
think it will be the last one as well. No doubt, he writes beautiful
sentences. It’s just that I don’t like him. His words fail to captivate
my attention.
Actually,
Coetzee’s concern for animals is endearing. I think this is one of his
major causes. He even integrated this in his novel. You see, it’s not
only the book cover that has a dog in it. The other half of it is
teeming with dogs.
Which
is not to say that I don’t like dogs. Okay, so let’s talk about the
novel itself. Disgrace is about this professor who carelessly goes into
an affair with a student. The object of the liaison comes from a rather
influential family, so our disgraced professor is chucked out from the
university.
He
then lives with his estranged daughter in a rural backdrop, and the two
are disgraced again. How? The unattractive and tomboyish daughter is
raped and his father, our protagonist, could not do anything about it.
Then
silence. And then the dogs. The father starts looking after the dogs in
the dog pound. Or is it a dog clinic? And I don’t recall how it ended. I
don’t even care.
You
see, I cannot find anything to attach myself with this supposedly grand
novel. I think something is wrong. I think I just didn’t get it. So
when I checked for the novel’s reception, it’s supposed to portray the
modern South Africa. Nice, but I don’t even know what South Africa was
before. I have an idea what apartheid is, but really, that is just some
strange, distant thing if you are in a country where there is only one
color.
I
think this book explores the problems of communication between father
and daughter. Yes, they found themselves in the most unfortunate
situation. But isn’t communicating your thoughts and feelings always a
good starting point to come up with a resolution? Yes, the daughter was
raped. Yes, the father was helplessly assaulted. Do I smell crushed egos
getting in the way? Pride as well?
Why is it so hard to swallow something so tasteless?
Oh,
I remember just now that I can still give Coetzee another chance. I
have yet to find a copy of his other famous work, Life and Times of
Michael K. I hope that one would redeem the author from the slight
disappointment that I had with Disgrace.
Or
maybe I could just lower my expectations even just a bit? I can’t
really help it though, especially in the case of Nobel laureates.
The
Nobel Prize for Literature is the ultimate award that a writer can get
his hands on. But yes, this prize is also one of the most controversial.
The winners are almost always unknown in a worldwide scale. There have
been accusations that the prize favors European writers, but what the
hey, the Nobel remains as it is: a prestigious award. It adds a sense of
importance to the person whom the award is given to, and we could not
really do much about it except trust that the people behind the Nobel
are doing a brilliant job.

Loved your review! I liked this book more than I expected to, having disliked the first Coetzee I read. I have to say, I liked Michael K a bit more though. And at one time I was working my way through the Nobel winners list, but I found I didn't enjoy those authors as much, I think because reading them was more "work" than "pleasure" for me.
ReplyDeleteWhat a bizarre review. It didn't fulfill your expectations because it won a slew of awards? Isn't that a problem with the reader and not the text?
ReplyDeleteLaura: I'm looking forward to Michael K. I hope I have a better experience with it.
ReplyDeleteMatthew: I'll take bizarre as a compliment. As I mentioned, I think I just didn't get it. And oh, I do not do "standard" reviews. It's more of blogging about a book than reviewing it.
Hi Angus,
ReplyDeletethe main message I got from the book about the modern South Africa came from the actions of the daughter after she was raped. She accepts what happens and, if I recall correctly, forgives the people who raped her because she sees their actions as a consequence of apartheid. The daughter lives an alternate lifestyle (her work etc.) which I believe symbolises how quickly the country changed in the post-apartheid era. As for the father, he represents the change in social and political power for those who profited from apartheid. He was rich and successful and it all came, inevitably, crashing down. Just some thoughts for you to consider. N.B. I too own a copy with the dog on the cover and am not a fan of it either!
I have never found that winning a prize makes a book a great read. Having said that I think Empire Falls was a very good choice for the Pulitzer.
ReplyDeleteAnn
Angus - where are you from?
ReplyDeleteI read Disgrace first and "appreciated" it rather than "enjoyed" it. Then I read Michael K and I don't care if everyone else in the world thinks it is brilliant, I did not. At that point, I abandoned Coetzee.
ReplyDeleteIt's funny because I don't get McEwan and Banville at all, whereas I really admire Coetzee's work. I was extremely surprised at how much I appreciated both Disgrace and Michael K.
ReplyDeletedenzanin: Hello, thanks for the input. I thought the daughter was filled with remorse, and the silent treatment she gave her father - is that forgiveness? Goodness, I've read this almost three years ago. Maybe I should reread?
ReplyDeleteCozy in Texas: I just can't help associating award-winners with great reads. Really, it's just me. :D
Athena K.: Hi, I'm from the Philippines. :)
Rose City Reader: Hmm. I'd like to find that out for myself (Michael K being brilliant).
1morechapter: Hmm. We are on the opposite sides of the fence. I prefer the works of McEwan and Banville, but I'd still like to try Michael K.
Awesome, Angus - looking forward to your perspective!
ReplyDelete